• Home
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Professionals
    • Publications
  • Practice Areas
    • Consumer Law & Contracts
    • Family Law
    • H-1B Visas
    • Landlord & Tenant
    • Online Defamation & Fraud
    • Small Business
    • Zoning
  • Getting Started
  • Case Study
  • Blog
  • Media
    • Eve Minter
  • Contact

In Virginia, May I Secretly Record a Conversation and is the Recorded Conversation Admissible as Evidence in Court?

5/1/2015

56 Comments

 
By Assya Thode

Whether a recorded conversation may be introduced as evidence in court has become a frequent question because everyone has access to recording devices on smart phones. Recorded conversation are governed by federal and state laws, so before recording a telephone call or an in-person conversation, you must consider the applicable laws to ensure that your recording is admissible.

Assuming the recording is for a permissible purpose,* the primary consideration is knowing whether your state or jurisdiction requires one party consent or two party consent.  As the name suggests, one party consent only requires permission to record the conversation from one of the parties participating in the conversation.  Therefore, if you are a party to the conversation, you may record it without obtaining permission from the other party or parties.  A two party consent rules requires consent by two or all parties in the conversation.  In other words, if you are part of the conversation, you must also get permission to record from the other party or parties.

Virginia is a one party consent jurisdiction and Virginia Code § 19.2-62 makes it a crime to intercept wire, electronic or oral communications, except if one party of the conversation consents to it. Again, this means that if you are participating in the conversation then you may record the conversation without the consent of the other parties, but if you are not participating in the conversation (the other parties do not know you are listening), then you need at least one party to the conservation to consent to the recording. 

However, Virginia distinguishes between in-person conversations and telephone conversations. Virginia Code § 19.2-61 defines “oral communications” to mean “any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectations but does not include any electronic communication.”  Therefore, you may record in-person conversations in a setting where the speaker does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy and where one party consents to the recording. 

If the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, like if you are trying to record a conversation inside the speaker’s home, following the stricter guidelines that apply to telephone conversations would be prudent.

Telephone conversations shall be admitted in a civil trial if (1) all parties were aware that the conversation was being recording because such notice was given at the beginning of the conversation to be admitted; or (2) the admissions, if true, are criminal conduct, and the basis of the civil action, then only one party consent is required, but this does not apply to proceedings in divorce, separate maintenance, or annulments. Virginia Code § 8.01-420.2.

You may be able to avoid some of the pitfalls involved with recording conversations if you video record a conversation where the camera is in plain view because consent may be presumed by the participants (if they did not consent they would not continue to speak while being video recorded).

If you are recording a conversation between parties in different states or jurisdictions, it is best to adhere to the strictest statute because although you may only need one party consent in your state, you may be committing a crime if the other state requires two party consent. For a list of consent requirements by state click here.

It is always illegal to record a conversation to which you are not a party and for which you do not have the consent of any party involved.

*Federal law 18 U.S.C. §2511(d) prohibits secretly recording a conversation if the recording is to be used for a criminal prosecution unless one of the parties consents.

This blog post provides general information only and is not intended to provide the reader with legal advice. Laws often change before websites can be updated, so please contact Steven Krieger Law for a consultation to evaluate your specific case.
56 Comments

    virgina and washington dc law

    Guide to the Virginia Court System: General District Court, Circuit Court, Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court

    Immigration Law: Employee Protections Under H-1B Work Status Visa

    Unemployment Benefits in Virginia: Do I Qualify Since I Was Fired

    The Eviction Process in Virginia: A Guide For Landlords And Tenants
    A Powerful Tool For Consumers: The Virginia Consumer Protection Act

    Author

    Steven and guests (lawyers and non-lawyers) will periodically post about topics relevant to his firm and practice areas. Your comments and feedback are always welcome. 

    Archives

    January 2019
    June 2018
    April 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    January 2016
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Business Entity
    Consumer Law
    Criminal Law
    Custody
    Debt Collection
    Defamation
    Employment Law
    Evidence
    Family Law
    H-1B
    Immigration
    Intellectual Property
    Landlord & Tenant
    Legal Theory
    Litigation
    Low Bono
    Plain English Guide
    Pro Se
    Visitation

    RSS Feed

    Legal Disclaimer

    The blog postings and information on this site are provided for informational purposes only and is only meant to provide a general overview or description of the law and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements.  It is not, nor is it intended to be, specific legal advice, which requires an analysis based on the specific factors unique to each case.  Therefore, do not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included on this site without seeking a confidential consultation from a knowledgeable attorney.

    By accessing this site you acknowledge that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and Steven Krieger Law, PLLC expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website.

Consumer Protection Law & Contracts
Family Law
H-1B Visa Wage Disputes
Landlord & Tenant
Online Defamation &  Fraud
Small Business
Zoning

Steven Krieger Law, PLLC
2200 Wilson Blvd. Suite 102
Arlington, VA 22201
703.831.7707
steven@stevenkriegerlaw.com
Legal Disclaimer & Terms of Use
© Copyright 2013-18 Steven Krieger Law, PLLC